WEKO3
アイテム
ペトルス・アベラルドゥス『倫理学』における「同意」
https://doi.org/10.18878/00001797
https://doi.org/10.18878/000017973297c054-c01d-4639-a046-7989b22fd3f3
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00004727427 (996.8 kB)
|
神戸女学院大学研究所
|
| Item type | 紀要論文(ELS) / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2007-03-15 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | ペトルス・アベラルドゥス『倫理学』における「同意」 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Consensus in Ethica Petri Abaelardi | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18878/00001797 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| ページ属性 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | P(論文) | |||||
| 著者名(日） |
高橋, 雅人
× 高橋, 雅人 |
|||||
| 著者名(英) |
TAKAHASHI, Masahito
× TAKAHASHI, Masahito |
|||||
| 著者所属（日） | ||||||
| 値 | 神戸女学院大学文学部 | |||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 値 | KOBE COLLEGE | |||||
| 要旨（英） | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | In his Ethica Petrus Abaelardus (Peter Abelard) mainly discusses what sin is and is not. Sin is an important Christian concept but is scarecely argued by ancient Greek philosophers, such as Plato and Aristotle. But Abelard also mentions his ethical treatise as Scito te ipsum. This title naturally reminds us of a pagan philosopher, Socrates, who argues about the evil (for example, ignorance), but not about sin. Therefore, the title Scito te ipsum sounds unsuitbale for its contents. Why does Abelard call his Ethica Scito te ipsum? To answer this question, I examine Abelard's concept of consent. He insists that neither desire nor action is sin, but only consent to what is not fitting is sin. He then argues that when the Law commands "do not do this" it means "do not consent to do this", that is, "do no to do this knowingly." Thus Abelard internalizes sin. Whether a person have consented to what is not fitting or not is invisible to other people ; only God and the person herself can know that. The internalization of sin explains why Abelard calls his ethical treatise Scito te ipsum. One must keep watch over one's mind lest one should consent to what is not fitting. To be a watch over oneself is to "Know thyself". | |||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00085725 | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
神戸女学院大学論集 en : KOBE COLLEGE STUDIES 巻 53, 号 3, p. 23-38, 発行日 2007-03-15 |
|||||
