@article{oai:kobe-c.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002044,
 author = {藏中, さやか and KURANAKA, Sayaka},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {神戸女学院大学論集, KOBE COLLEGE STUDIES},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {P(論文), 歌題集成書は、出題手引書として使用されたと考えられてきた書物である。その書記形式は、催事名、詠作機会やその年次、出題者名を記した後で、歌題を列記するというものである。出題者という立場で、或いは催事毎の歌題組成の比較をしたいという学習者の視点をもって歌題集成書を眺めた場合、従来的な催事別もしくは組題数別の書き方は、その要求に十分に応えうる書記形式として受けとめられなかったこともあったようだ。歌題集成書は、その享受や利用という観点から、抄出されたり新たな書記形式が編み出されたりすることがあった。本稿は、従来未紹介の歌題集成書一点を取り上げ、同書が明題部類抄の写本として独自の書記形式にをもつ一本であることを示す。さらにその書記形式のねらいとその元となった明題部類抄の本文系統について言及し、これを歌題集成書展開の一事例として意義づける。, Kadai compilations have so far been intended to be used as handbooks for Kadai subject proposals. Their descriptive style is characterized by lists of the nemes of events, the years of waka poem compositions, and the nemes of Kadai subject proposers, which were followed by their titles. If one takes the viewpoint of a scholar who proposes Kadai subjects or compares the Kadai compositions of each event, the conventional styles of these descriptions, which were sorted by events, and the waka poem numbers in a unit, cannot be accepted as descriptions that fully meet the demands in some cases. Based on this background and these reasons, novel descriptive style of Kadai compilations, which focused on reception and usage, have been occasionally thought out. The present manuscript highlights an unknown Kadai compilation, and thereby indicates that it has a unique descriptive style as a manuscript copy of Medai-buruisyo. In addition, the author mentions the objectives of the descriptive styles as well as the body text of Medai-buruisyo, which presumably influenced those styles, in an attempt to propose its significance as an example of development of Kadai compilations.},
 pages = {1--12},
 title = {歌題集成書の展開-明題部類抄を抄出する一事例を通して-},
 volume = {60},
 year = {2013},
 yomi = {クラナカ, サヤカ}
}