@article{oai:kobe-c.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002184,
 author = {浜下, 昌宏 and HAMASHITA, Masahiro},
 journal = {女性学評論, Women's studies forum},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {P(論文), In the tradition of Platonism noteworthy are Plotinus and Ficino in terms of the conception of two Aphrodites. Plotinus argues in "On Eros"of the Enneades that Aphrodite Urania has no relationship with the idea of marriage, and that Aphrodite Pandemos is the guardian of marriage. Marriage means a vulgar custom which is far different from spiritual attitudes required of philosophers. Aphrodite Urania is regarded as a member of the Uranos family, keeping a purified spirit away from material elements. She also represents the daughter of Kronos(=intellect), which means that she is a most divine spirit which is the third in the order of Plotinus's system(God-intellect-spirit). Aphrodite Pandemos is dismissed in Plotinus's thought because of her material character. Generally, Plotinus seems not to make less use of the mythological way of thinking than Plato. Ficino appreciates and comments on Plato's Symposium in his Commentarium in Convivium Platonis, de Amore. Aphrodite Urania and Aphrodite Pandemos correspond respectively to intellect and spirit(=anima mundi). Besides, Aphrodite Pandemos has relation, on one hand, with the power of terrestrial movement because she is a daughter of Zeus who is a mover of the celestial world, and on the other hand, also with the material world because she was born as a daughter of Dione. These two relations in Aphrodite Pandemos's character suggest her status as a symbol of prolificity. Thus two Aphrodites have their position in Ficino's hierarchy of being:God-angel(=intellect)- spirit(=anima)- nature- material. Supporting the work by Eros, Aphrodite Urania perceives beauty as the image of God and Aphrodite Pandemos tries to reproduce that image. Ficino seems not to discriminate definitely between the two Aphrodites because his concept of successive emanation of being implies that their difference is not in their ontological kind but in their ontological degree. So his idea of two Aphrodites may overcome the opposition between celestial love and terrestrial love, sacred love and profane love, spiritual love and sexual love, and between beauty and fertility.},
 pages = {31--42},
 title = {二体のアプロディテ (2)},
 volume = {9},
 year = {1995},
 yomi = {ハマシタ, マサヒロ}
}