{"created":"2023-06-19T10:54:11.151675+00:00","id":3967,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"02623bda-3c2e-42a6-9bef-f5c78f5a9305"},"_deposit":{"created_by":17,"id":"3967","owners":[17],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"3967"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:kobe-c.repo.nii.ac.jp:00003967","sets":["29"]},"author_link":["5085"],"item_10006_date_granted_31":{"attribute_name":"学位授与年月日","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_dategranted":"2016-03-17"}]},"item_10006_degree_grantor_29":{"attribute_name":"学位授与機関","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_degreegrantor":[{"subitem_degreegrantor_name":"神戸女学院大学"}]}]},"item_10006_degree_name_28":{"attribute_name":"学位名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_degreename":"博士(人間科学)"}]},"item_10006_description_27":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"風景構成法・バウムテストの特性を、時代的な変化と「木」の比較から見出そうとしたものである。時代的変化を検討した研究1・2では、過去のLMT構成度が高く自我発達により差が生じた可能性を示した。バウム形態は幹表現に有意差があり、枝表現ではなかった。形態・印象比較を行った研究3では、年少・中学・大学生で同形態の木を描く傾向が認められ、印象差のない大学生のみLMTの木にバウム解釈を当てはめられる可能性を示唆した。","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10006_dissertation_number_32":{"attribute_name":"学位授与番号","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_dissertationnumber":"34510甲第19号"}]},"item_10006_text_30":{"attribute_name":"学位授与年度","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"2015"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"岸川, 加奈子"},{"creatorName":"キシカワ, カナコ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"},{"creatorName":"KISHIKAWA, Kanako","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"5085","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2016-06-09"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"論文の要旨と審査結果(甲第19号).pdf","filesize":[{"value":"203.9 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"論文の要旨と審査結果(甲第19号)","url":"https://kobe-c.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/3967/files/論文の要旨と審査結果(甲第19号).pdf"},"version_id":"b38b5fd2-ba0d-412f-9983-a12d2c68ced2"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"風景構成法","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"バウムテスト","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"描画","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"比較","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"thesis","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec"}]},"item_title":"風景構成法とバウムテストの比較 ~時代的変化による検討と「木」表現の比較~","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"風景構成法とバウムテストの比較 ~時代的変化による検討と「木」表現の比較~"}]},"item_type_id":"10006","owner":"17","path":["29"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2016-06-09"},"publish_date":"2016-06-09","publish_status":"0","recid":"3967","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["風景構成法とバウムテストの比較 ~時代的変化による検討と「木」表現の比較~"],"weko_creator_id":"17","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-06-19T11:27:10.328617+00:00"}