{"created":"2023-06-19T10:55:10.262574+00:00","id":5749,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"23fd1a18-26f5-4594-90a6-3e120e9eb858"},"_deposit":{"created_by":20,"id":"5749","owners":[20],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"5749"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:kobe-c.repo.nii.ac.jp:00005749","sets":["40:1435:1436"]},"author_link":["5816"],"item_10002_biblio_info_30":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2020-12-20","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"2","bibliographicPageEnd":"17","bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"67","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"神戸女学院大学論集"},{"bibliographic_title":"KOBE COLLEGE STUDIES","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_description_28":{"attribute_name":"要旨(日）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Q方法論は、定性的手法と定量的手法を利用して主観的な考え（subjectivity）を体系的に研究するアプローチ法である。主成分分析や他の因子分析は計算能力が向上したにも関わらず、重心因子分析はQ方法論の中で重要な役割を果たしている。本論文では、重心因子分析を抽出するためにQ方法論で使用されていない Tucker-MacCallum（T-M）法と、Q方法論で一般的に使用されている手法を比較する。様々なサイズと構造の異なる4つのデータセットを3つの因子抽出法で調べたところ、これら3つの手法は最初の2〜3の抽出された因子に対して非常に類似した負荷を生成する傾向にあることを示したが、残りの因子に対してはそれぞれ異なる結果をもたらしている。本論文で検討した4つのデータセットについて、少なくとも一つの手法で次善となる要因が生じた。T-M法によって出てくる結果は、より詳しい統計が抽出されたが、重心因子分析のために必要な要因の数を決めるための情報は、こちらの研究ではあまり役立たなかった。これらの結果として、T-M法はQ方法論で現在使用されている手法に併せて有用である可能性があることを示唆している。","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_49":{"attribute_name":"要旨（英）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Q methodology is an approach to systematically studying subjectivity that draws on both qualitative and quantitative methods. Despite the improvements in computing power that have made principal component analysis and other types of factor analysis possible, centroid factor analysis remains an important component of Q methodology. In this paper the Tucker-MacCallum method for the extraction of centroid factors is compared to the more commonly used methods in Q methodology. Four data sets of varying size are examined using the three factor extraction methods. The results show that the three methods tend to produce very similar loadings for the first two or three factors, but then tend to have divergent results for the remaining factors. For each of the four data sets examined in the paper, at least one of the methods had difficulty producing well-defined factors. The “criterion L” statistic provided by the Tucker-MacCallum extraction method did not provide much assistance for decisions related to the number of factors that should be retained for analysis. Overall, the results suggest that the Tucker-MacCallum extraction method could be a useful addition to the currently available methods in Q methodology.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.18878/00005671","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_10002_select_43":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_select_item":"publisher"}]},"item_10002_text_31":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"神戸女学院大学研究所"}]},"item_10002_text_47":{"attribute_name":"著者所属","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"神戸女学院大学 文学部 英文学科 教授"}]},"item_10002_text_48":{"attribute_name":"雑誌書誌ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"AN00085725"}]},"item_10002_text_50":{"attribute_name":"副題","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"Q方法論における重心因子分析抽出法の比較について"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"BANASICK, Shawn"},{"creatorName":"BANASICK, Shawn","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"5816","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"},{"nameIdentifier":"9000242389125","nameIdentifierScheme":"CiNii ID","nameIdentifierURI":"http://ci.nii.ac.jp/nrid/9000242389125"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2021-01-05"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"202012_185-02.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.3 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","license_note":"神戸女学院大学研究所","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"202012_185-02","url":"https://kobe-c.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/5749/files/202012_185-02.pdf"},"version_id":"034bf263-6089-4857-b70c-314f3025be92"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"Q 方法論","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"重心因子分析","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Tucker-MacCallum重心因子抽出法","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Q methodology","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"centroid factor analysis","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Tucker-MacCallum centroid factor extraction method","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"eng"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"A Comparison of Centroid Factor Extraction Methods for Q Methodology","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"A Comparison of Centroid Factor Extraction Methods for Q Methodology"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"20","path":["1436"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2021-01-05"},"publish_date":"2021-01-05","publish_status":"0","recid":"5749","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["A Comparison of Centroid Factor Extraction Methods for Q Methodology"],"weko_creator_id":"20","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-06-19T11:20:32.648727+00:00"}