WEKO3
アイテム
被修飾語「の」の性質と機能
https://doi.org/10.18878/00001578
https://doi.org/10.18878/00001578156918d2-0f9d-4942-962d-89b4e420c847
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00000096874 (429.8 kB)
|
神戸女学院大学研究所
|
| Item type | 紀要論文(ELS) / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2002-12-01 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 被修飾語「の」の性質と機能 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | The nature and the function of the modified word NO | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18878/00001578 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| ページ属性 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | P(論文) | |||||
| 論文名よみ | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | ヒ シュウショクゴ ノ ノ セイシツ ト キノウ | |||||
| 著者名(日） |
陳, 訪澤
× 陳, 訪澤 |
|||||
| 著者名(英) |
CHEN, Frangze
× CHEN, Frangze |
|||||
| 著者所属（日） | ||||||
| 値 | 神戸女学院大学 | |||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 値 | Kobe College | |||||
| 要旨（英） | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | The modified word no, which follows the attributive form of Yogen or auxiliary verb and was called "formal noun" or"juntai particle" can be distinguished as two different kinds based on the relationship between no and preceding clause. One is that can be put into the clause, and they form a "relative noun clause". Another is that cannot be put into the clause, and they form an" appositive noun clause". When the appositive noun clause is placed at the comment of a cleft sentence, sometimes no must be replaced by koto, and sometimes the sentence will be ungrammatical even if it is replaced by koto. Relative noun clause has no such problem but no will disappear when the cleft-sentence transformation operation is made. The point of how to distinguish a relative noun clause from an appositive noun clause is that whether no can be put into the clause or not. The judgment is not based on no itself but on the elements preceding or following no in the sentence. In the cleft sentence, because no is defined by the element of comment, all noun clauses in the topic are relative noun clauses. Since no only plays a role of grammar, it is just a symbol of clause. No in appositive noun clause is also defined by the element preceding or following in the sentence. As it is a semantic element, it cannot appear or disappear under grammatical operation. Because the two kinds of no are different in nature and function, it is necessary to distinguish them in Japanese grammar education. | |||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00085725 | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
神戸女学院大学論集 en : KOBE COLLEGE STUDIES 巻 49, 号 2, p. 81-89, 発行日 2002-12-20 |
|||||
