WEKO3
アイテム
〈コケット〉の系譜 -Eliza Wharton から Lily Bart ヘ-
https://doi.org/10.18878/00002049
https://doi.org/10.18878/00002049de5b8fba-c4d7-436c-8c62-96f722026a0d
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00007682399 (906.3 kB)
|
神戸女学院大学
女性学インスティチュート |
| Item type | 紀要論文(ELS) / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 1987-03-01 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 〈コケット〉の系譜 -Eliza Wharton から Lily Bart ヘ- | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | All Those Pretty American Flirts!-A Vindication of the "Coquettes" | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18878/00002049 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| ページ属性 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | P(論文) | |||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||
| 値 | 論文 | |||||
| 記事種別(英) | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 値 | Article | |||||
| 論文名よみ | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | コケット ノ ケイフ Eliza Wharton カラ Lily Bart ヘ | |||||
| 著者名(日） |
別府, 恵子
× 別府, 恵子 |
|||||
| 著者名(英) |
BEPPU, Keiko
× BEPPU, Keiko |
|||||
| 著者所属（日） | ||||||
| 値 | 神戸女学院大学(アメリカ文学) | |||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 値 | Professsor of Kobe College (American Literature) | |||||
| 要旨（英） | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | More than a decade ago, Mary Daly declared:"To exist humanly is to name the self,the world, and God."If we may add this right of naming to "the inalienable rights"of man, woman has been deprived of one of "the inalienable rights"since the beginning of history. When God created Adam, He gave him the right to name all the creatures of the universe. To name then is to define, even to beget,a thing. Language conditions as well as expresses experience. Only recently feminist literary criticism has alerted us to the historical fact that men have been the namers and definers. And sexism and language has now become an area where poets and scholars venture to explore the root of all evil, as it were. In the past,language has been used,largely by men,to define the other's(=woman's) experience, and regulate and restrict her activities. Similarly, literature, that is language imaginatively used, has contributed to the perpetuation of stereotypical fictional women characters, thereby depriving women of their individuality. This brief consideration of Eliza Wharton in Hannah Foster's The Coquette(1797), Daisy Miller in Henry James's "Daisy Miller"(1878), and Lily Bart in Edith Wharton's The House of Mirth(1905) traces the genealogy of the"Coquettes."It also examines how such naming(labelling)inhibits the free play of what is good in these"pretty American flirts,"which is no less than the violation of their personality and annihilation of their being. It is hoped,finally,that the paper will clarify the nature of the linguistic violence committed on women in literature and in life. | |||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10066294 | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
女性学評論 en : Women's studies forum 巻 1, p. 1-19, 発行日 1987-03 |
|||||
