WEKO3
アイテム
不在の子宮 -メアリー・シェリーの『フランケンシュタイン』を読む-
https://doi.org/10.18878/00002118
https://doi.org/10.18878/0000211895b6590d-a5d7-4296-a568-3aa93d6924ca
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00007679559 (880.8 kB)
|
神戸女学院大学
女性学インスティチュート |
| Item type | 紀要論文(ELS) / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 1993-03-01 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 不在の子宮 -メアリー・シェリーの『フランケンシュタイン』を読む- | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | The Absent Womb: A Reading of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18878/00002118 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| ページ属性 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | P(論文) | |||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||
| 値 | 特集 | |||||
| 記事種別(英) | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 値 | Special Issue | |||||
| 論文名よみ | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | フザイ ノ シキュウ メアリー シェリー ノ フランケンシュタイン オ ヨム | |||||
| 著者名(日） |
渡部, 充
× 渡部, 充 |
|||||
| 著者名(英) |
Watanabe, Mitsuru
× Watanabe, Mitsuru |
|||||
| 著者所属（日） | ||||||
| 値 | 神戸女学院大学文学部英文学科(イギリス文学) | |||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 値 | Lecturer of Kobe College, English Department(English Literature) | |||||
| 要旨（英） | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | The female characters of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein play essentially the same role of a subservient <Domestic Angel> and fall so vulnerably and innocently into the hands of the nameless creature,`Monster.'Such feminist critics as Moers,Poovey,Gilbert and Gubar,and Johnson, however, have shown that the male-dominance of the narrative and the monstrosity of the solitary heroes indicate that the consideration of relationship between<Woman Writer> and her text is very important to understand this seminal modern horror fully. This paper, drawing on the implicit metaphors of <Womb> on two levels of story-telling and of story-told, offers a new reading of Frankenstein. The monstrosity of the Monster, Victor, and Mary will respectively be shown as a head-on collision of the direct but ambiguous opposites, such as Creator/ Creature,Father/ Son,Culture/ Nature,(Woman)Writer/(Her) Text, and others. By acting out into the story her deep-felt antagonism between being forced to be a <Domestic Angel> and trying to be a <Woman Writer=Monster>,Mary, like Frankenstein himself, became a progenitor of herself, the author of Frankenstein. Her Monster,in its widest sense, represents the transgression of Frankenstein. Her Monster, in its widest sense,represents the transgression of the boundary between the level of human genealogy/ of story-told and the meta-level of super-human genealogy/ of story-telling. Thus, ati the end of the novel,the Monster is relieved from Mary's threefold narrative frame,to be her"hideous progeny"and"go forth and prosper" in this world of "Waking Dreams" | |||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10066294 | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
女性学評論 en : Women's studies forum 巻 7, p. 63-82, 発行日 1993-03 |
|||||
