WEKO3
アイテム
二体のアプロディテ (2)
https://doi.org/10.18878/00002145
https://doi.org/10.18878/00002145eed4ea1b-f7e3-4985-82bf-cd52197e890f
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00000571272 (549.1 kB)
|
神戸女学院大学
女性学インスティチュート |
| Item type | 紀要論文(ELS) / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 1995-03-01 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 二体のアプロディテ (2) | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Two Aphrodites (II) | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18878/00002145 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| ページ属性 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | P(論文) | |||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||
| 値 | 論文 | |||||
| 記事種別(英) | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 値 | Article | |||||
| 論文名よみ | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | ニタイ ノ アプロディテ 2 | |||||
| 著者名(日） |
浜下, 昌宏
× 浜下, 昌宏 |
|||||
| 著者名(英) |
HAMASHITA, Masahiro
× HAMASHITA, Masahiro |
|||||
| 著者所属（日） | ||||||
| 値 | 神戸女学院大学文学部総合文化学科(美学) | |||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 値 | Associate Professor of Kobe College,Intercultural Department(Aesthetics) | |||||
| 要旨（英） | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | In the tradition of Platonism noteworthy are Plotinus and Ficino in terms of the conception of two Aphrodites. Plotinus argues in "On Eros"of the Enneades that Aphrodite Urania has no relationship with the idea of marriage, and that Aphrodite Pandemos is the guardian of marriage. Marriage means a vulgar custom which is far different from spiritual attitudes required of philosophers. Aphrodite Urania is regarded as a member of the Uranos family, keeping a purified spirit away from material elements. She also represents the daughter of Kronos(=intellect), which means that she is a most divine spirit which is the third in the order of Plotinus's system(God-intellect-spirit). Aphrodite Pandemos is dismissed in Plotinus's thought because of her material character. Generally, Plotinus seems not to make less use of the mythological way of thinking than Plato. Ficino appreciates and comments on Plato's Symposium in his Commentarium in Convivium Platonis, de Amore. Aphrodite Urania and Aphrodite Pandemos correspond respectively to intellect and spirit(=anima mundi). Besides, Aphrodite Pandemos has relation, on one hand, with the power of terrestrial movement because she is a daughter of Zeus who is a mover of the celestial world, and on the other hand, also with the material world because she was born as a daughter of Dione. These two relations in Aphrodite Pandemos's character suggest her status as a symbol of prolificity. Thus two Aphrodites have their position in Ficino's hierarchy of being:God-angel(=intellect)- spirit(=anima)- nature- material. Supporting the work by Eros, Aphrodite Urania perceives beauty as the image of God and Aphrodite Pandemos tries to reproduce that image. Ficino seems not to discriminate definitely between the two Aphrodites because his concept of successive emanation of being implies that their difference is not in their ontological kind but in their ontological degree. So his idea of two Aphrodites may overcome the opposition between celestial love and terrestrial love, sacred love and profane love, spiritual love and sexual love, and between beauty and fertility. | |||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10066294 | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
女性学評論 en : Women's studies forum 巻 9, p. 31-42, 発行日 1995-03 |
|||||
